Digging and Stumbling for Traffic
Is your approach bringing, or stopping traffic?
Both StumbleUpon and Digg have the potential to be real traffic boosters for your website or blog. They can also put an effective roadblock on your attempts to make it anywhere if you and your friends are not using them the right way.
You have to remember that these networks were not designed to drive traffic to you; they were designed with their own well being in mind. Not yours. Users who want more than they give are not going to be very successful.
Digg and StumbleUpon both rely on people to submit and vote on content. They have complex algorithms for calculating what stories should be promoted to popularity status and which ones shouldn’t. The common thread for these calculations is that they attempt to stop users from manipulating the system, and they are pretty successful at it. Far too many users are trying to manipulate the system to get traffic, this will be hard to do and is the primary reason why it isn’t working. There is a much easier way to use the system that will inevitably get you traffic - and a lot of it.
What is the Right Way?
1. Participate
This is the base for all Social Networking success. Be an active part of the network so that you add as much as you hope to receive. However, as you will see later in this post. Mindless participation doesn’t do much.
2. Think about what the network wants
The Networks both want users to submit and vote on GOOD content, they have checks and balances to make sure that the votes counted are worth something.
3. Comment
Commenting shows the system that you are giving this article more attention, which automatically will make a comment worth more than just a vote.
A Closer Look at Digg
Digg has the option to shout pages to your friends. Since Digg wants to promote good content. Do you think they are going to give a vote where the reader isn’t looking at the article first? For Digg, the key is to either submit the vote from the page with a button on the article, or use that hyperlink before you click digg. If you vote without looking at what you are voting for; Digg will know and compensate accordingly.
When I have shouted a Digg article to friends, the total amount of traffic is directly related to how many hits I get from that shout. I’ve had articles with 30 diggs but only 4 actual hits. In other words, the people that dugg the article didn’t read it. The total amount of traffic there was about 20 hits.
Then I have had articles with about as many hits and 20 hits from the shout. Which gave me a total traffic of over a hundred. Digg’s algorithm saw that people were actually reading the article before voting and kept it higher on their pages for longer.
StumbleUpon
Stumble is different, when you thumb up an article there, the best "value" of a vote is when the user arrived at that page because of the Stumble button. Not if they vote from the article itself.
A stumble always happens from the page or article, so the problem encountered at Digg with users not actually reading the page isn’t present. What I am fairly sure about thought is that Stumble will look at how long you spend on a page before voting. A lot of testing has shown that Votes inside of a couple of seconds after arriving don’t count for much there.
Commenting for Traffic
If you really want to be an active part of the community and become a powerful voter, you have to comment. Your comments are worth a lot more than your clicks. Comments on your post will drive it up the algorithm scales much quicker than votes will. If you comment on others, they will comment on you. It’s that simple.
Choose your friends wisely
It is easy to just go ahead and slam on as many friends as possible, thinking that it will boost your power and traffic as a result. This is not necessarily true at all.
On Digg for instance. Having a lot of friends will actually make articles you submit and shout harder to get promoted to popular. There are reports that people with a lot of friends are seeing this effect clearly although it is not documented on their site. Also votes inside your network aren’t worth as much as votes that are completely unrelated to you. Having a lot of friends that aren’t’ reading and voting is actually slowing you down.
On Stumble, You are limited to 200 friends, this seems like a lot, but if those friends are added randomly without understanding what they are looking for, they might actually not be your best option.
Chances are that if your friend isn’t interested much in your topic, they are not going to vote you up when they get to your pages. If you aren’t getting thumbs up, then you are not getting the benefit of them promoting it to their networks. This will immediately show up in your numbers.
Avoid the temptation of adding anyone and everyone that you can find, add the people that show interest in your items already, if they vote on your articles, they are likely to want to read more of them in the future and do it again.
Make friends in your own topic area, they are also looking for your information and will have friends that are doing the same. This is where your traffic will come from.
Finally never underestimate the power of good content. The same old story will always be true, good content will always do better than bad. Work on your writing and the results will show up.
Good luck, and if you liked this, I hope that you will Digg or Stumble it as well.









May 17th, 2008 at 9:33 am
great post and very nice blog. solid information that i can use. check mine out too.
thanks
May 17th, 2008 at 11:14 am
This is a must-to-read article for all who care to get the best of social networking sites.
You are totally right. Don’t expect to receive more than what you give.
May 17th, 2008 at 1:16 pm
Great article with a lot of info that I did not know. I will share this with my social network buddies. Definitely a digg and a stumble with comment lol.
May 17th, 2008 at 7:44 pm
That’s good information.
I’ve been using Digg for a while now, it’s pretty fun to use in general, I like making comments and digging interesting stuff. On the other hand, I haven’t really tried StumbleUpon, though I do have an account there, so I guess I’ll give that a go next.
I’m not sure if I’m going to have enough time to use both sites though, so I may have to make a choice between the two.
May 17th, 2008 at 8:03 pm
Wow….This is a great article. I’m shocked that you chose to post such linkable content on the weekend though. This one would have sprinted up the charts on a Wednesday. lol Great post though!
May 17th, 2008 at 8:47 pm
excellent info.. wish the wife and I had known about this long ago..
dugg and stumbled.. oh and I did read it BEFORE stumbling…
May 18th, 2008 at 5:16 am
Yeah they are both great social networks and i get quite a bit of traffic from them both…however with stumbleupon i can get massive traffic surges sometimes that is like bang…the most i got was with one page getting 170 visitors in one hour…
All your tips are great and i agree on them all…
May 18th, 2008 at 7:23 am
This is an excellent post, but since I’m fairly new to blogging, “Digg” and “Stumble” are still foreign words to me!
MM
May 18th, 2008 at 7:44 am
Thank you so much for sharing this information. It’s it super valuable and will help me in my approach to share my blog and website with others…I hope.
Time will tell.
Thank you again. This article is GREAT!
Doc KC
http://www.DOCintheBiz.com
July 7th, 2008 at 4:21 pm
Avoid the temptation of adding anyone and everyone that you can find, add the people that show interest in your items already, if they vote on your articles, they are likely to want to read more of them in the future and do it again.
That makes great sense Excellent article and awesome tips